As family and friends and neighbors argue Red Team v Blue Team, the Global Elite keep marching everyone towards WWIII.
The reality that the Ukrainian NAZIs are losing the war didn't stop NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg from bragging that, "we have 500,000 troops at high readiness across all domains" for war with Russia. They're deploying more nukes too.
Then we have the on-going war of Ben Shapiro's favorite country. Trump says "Israel should attack Iran’s nuclear facilities".
Of course, the constant (needless) provocation of China... Basically, WWIII is inevitable.
Meanwhile, Congress is beefing up the draft. Supposedly for efficiency. They want to conscript women too. All the cool countries are doing it these days.
Firestorm erupts over requiring women to sign up for military draft
Senate Democrats have added language to the annual defense authorization bill to require women to register for the draft, prompting a backlash from Republicans and social conservatives and complicating the chances of moving the bill on the Senate floor before Election Day.
Wait. Hold the phone.
Here come the "fact checkers"!
Summer of the draft: What govt and think tanks are planning and why
All this talk has compelled “fact checkers” to insist that no, the U.S. government isn’t suddenly “laying the groundwork” for a draft.
But saying the U.S. isn’t preparing for a draft is like saying it isn’t preparing for nuclear war. Just as the Department of Defense is tasked with maintaining readiness to initiate nuclear strikes whenever the Commander-In-Chief so orders, the Selective Service System has the sole mission of maintaining readiness to hold a draft lottery within five days and start selecting draftees and sending out notices to report for induction whenever Congress and the President so order.
There’s room for argument about how likely it is that the U.S. would launch nuclear missiles or activate a draft. But there’s no question that it’s planning and preparing for both, as it has been for decades...
It's the same shit everywhere... Brits say "Civilians Must Be Ready To Fight".
Your children will die fighting a meaningless World War III... for the benefit of the Elites.
Why Military Conscription Is Worse Than Slavery
Libertarians understand — or should understand — that military conscription is a form of slavery or involuntary servitude. In fact, everyone should understand this. And yet conscription has been employed by the U.S. government for the past 161 years, ever since Abraham Lincoln signed the first federal conscription act into law in March 1863, enslaving thousands of American men.
For those who are killed in battle or executed for desertion, conscription is worse than slavery because it robs them of their very lives. To this day, one of the penalties for desertion in wartime is death. At various times in history the U.S. government has shot deserters in firing squads, and it has even imprisoned or shot civilian conscription protesters.
As Americans turn their backs on freedom and individual liberty, I'll end with a quote from the socialist, HG Wells:
War is a collective concern; to turn one’s back upon it, to refuse to consider it as a possibility, is to leave it entirely to those who are least prepared to deal with it in a broad spirit.
In many ways war is the most socialistic of all forces. In many ways military organization is the most peaceful of activities. When the contemporary man steps from the street, of clamorous insincere advertisement, push, adulteration, underselling and intermittent employment into the barrack-yard, he steps on to a higher social plane, into an atmosphere of service and cooperation and of infinitely more honorable emulations. Here at least men are not flung out of employment to degenerate because there is no immediate work for them to do. They are fed and drilled and trained for better services. Here at least a man is supposed to win promotion by self-forgetfulness and not by self-seeking. And beside the feeble and irregular endowment of research by commercialism, its little shortsighted snatches at profit by innovation and scientific economy, see how remarkable is the steady and rapid development of method and appliances in naval and military affairs! Nothing is more striking than to compare the progress of civil conveniences which has been left almost entirely to the trader, to the progress in military apparatus during the last few decades. The house appliances of to-day for example, are little better than they were fifty years ago. A house of to-day is still almost as ill-ventilated, badly heated by wasteful fires, clumsily arranged and furnished as the house of 1858. Houses a couple of hundred years old are still satisfactory places of residence, so little have our standards risen. But the rifle or battleship of fifty years ago was beyond all comparison inferior to those we possess; in power, in speed, in convenience alike. No one has a use now for such superannuated things.
War denies you, as an individual. War is a "collective" effort. Individuals, which everyone of you reading this happen to be, are just mass for the collective meat grinder.