"We Need TOTAL CONTROL"

Please share!

Prior to the internet, everyone consumed the same "narratives", told to us by a handful of "licensed" television and radio stations. In other words, the federal government virtually controlled the information we received.

They've lost control... and Bill Clinton's wife is on the war path... against anyone and everyone who doesn't agree with her!

Jimmy Dore and Kurt Metzger (video above):

Ever since she was calling for the assassination of Julian Assange, Hillary Clinton established a well-deserved reputation as an enemy of the first amendment. Now she’s burnishing that reputation by insisting that the government needs to “control” social media to prevent the spread of disfavored ideas.

"Stalin in Pantsuit"... rotflmao!

WATCH: Hillary Clinton, Stalin in Pantsuit, Calls For ‘Total Control’ of Social Media

America’s most notorious and unsavory mule dyke, Hillary Clinton, refuses to go away after her humiliating and rightly career-ending defeat at the hands of a political novice real estate mogul in 2016.

Just last week, Clinton was on corporate media calling for “criminal penalties” levied against domestic terrorists for spreading something called “misinformation.”

.. if they don’t moderate and monitor the content we lose total control and it’s not just the social and psychological effects...

In a similar totalitarian outburst last week, unelected Climate Change™ Commissar John Kerry went full Mao in front of his overlords at the WEF.

Bonesman and failed presidential candidate, John Kerry, just explained why free speech is so incredibly important... to oppose dumbasses like him!

VIDEO: John Kerry Goes to War With First Amendment, Calls it ‘Major Block’ to Censorship Regime

This election, Deep State goblin John Kerry explains at the World Economic Forum, will determine whether he and his comrades can garner "enough votes" to "hammer" the First Amendment "out of existence".

...So it’s really, really hard, much harder to build consensus today than at any time in the 45 or 50 years I’ve been involved in this. And there’s a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you’re going to have some accountability on facts, etcetera... our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to just hammer it out of existence. So what you need, what we need, is to win the ground, win the right to govern by, hopefully, winning enough votes that you’re free to be able to implement change.

The whole point of the 1st Amendent is to "stands as a major block" against you and your governing kind, Kerry.

Nerd boy and diabolical plutocrat, Bill Gates, doesn't like you picking on his products.

Bill Gates Defends Free Speech — Unless It Hurts His Investments

Bill Gates took a shot at free speech, the First Amendment, and everyone who questions vaccines and vaccine safety in a CNBC interview earlier this month.

“We should have free speech, but if you’re inciting violence, if you’re causing people not to take vaccines, where are those boundaries that even the U.S. should have rules? And then if you have rules, what is it?” Gates asked on CNBC’s “Make It.”

Gates made similar remarks this month in an interview with CNET, during which he directly targeted the First Amendment:

The US is a tough one because we have the notion of the First Amendment and what are the exceptions like yelling ‘fire’ in a theater. … I do think over time … most of the time you’re online you’re going to want to be in an environment where the people are truly identified … instead of just people saying whatever they want.

...He lamented his “naivete, that when we made information available, that people would want correct information.”

Sick. Twisted tyrants.

It's going to get worse.

The Coming Strangulation of Free Speech

It’s the First Amendment for a reason: free speech is a fundamental prerequisite for liberal democracy. But The Guardian, with logic that Stalin would have appreciated, insists the concern over free speech has been “concocted” by the Right. This is one example of many that shows the assault on free speech today primarily comes from the very people — the legacy media, academia, and progressives — who once championed unencumbered dialogue.

Ultimately, the issue goes well beyond partisan politics. Liberalism and democracy without free speech is little more than a sham. The pressure now threatens to create a media and speech culture more akin to the People’s Republic of China than what the American Founders bequeathed to us.

Woke Language Is a Weapon of War... Freedom of speech restricts power.

Authoritarianism has a voting block.

The Democrats Have Some Seriously Dangerous Pro-Censorship Views.

Historically, freedom of speech has been a left-wing cause. Noam Chomsky, one of the intellectual pioneers of left-wing thought was always a strong defender of free speech famously saying :

If we don't believe in free expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.

However, as the Democratic Party moves farther and farther away from traditional left-wing values and closer toward authoritarian neo-cons such as Dick Cheney they have abandoned this traditional left-wing principle for the establishment view that America needs more censorship to police so-called “misinformation".

The Democrats not only defended the intelligence agencies’ censorship of social media but actively tried to put Matt Taibbi in prison for revealing this fact...

Kamala Harris’s Vice President Tim Walz said “There is no guarantee of free speech on misinformation or hate speech” even though they are clearly both protected by the First Amendment.

2016 Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton took this a step farther and said that Americans who spread so-called Russian disinformation should be “civilly, or even in some cases criminally charged”. Clinton is quick to call anyone that calls out her bloodthirsty warmongering bullshit a foreign agent. In 2019 she claimed without evidence that Jill Stein was a “Russian asset” and implied the same about then-presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard.

Free speech, just like war and peace is another issue where the democrats have taken the neocon establishment line and the Republicans despite claiming otherwise are not better.

Supreme Court proves itself pathetic.

Supreme Court Unleashes Censors and Betrays Democracy

The court ruled in the case of Murthy v. Missouri, a lawsuit brought by individuals censored on social media thanks to federal threats and machinations. Court decisions last year vividly chronicled a byzantine litany of anti–free speech interventions by multiple federal agencies and the White House. On July 4, 2023, federal judge Terry Doughty condemned the Biden administration for potentially “the most massive attack against free speech in United States history.” A federal appeals court imposed injunctions on federal officials to prohibit them from acting “to coerce or significantly encourage social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce … posted social-media content containing protected free speech.”

Rather than swine groveling in the muck, the Supreme Court instead disposed of this landmark case on a quibble, putting their legal pinkies up in the air like a white-wine drinker at a cocktail reception. The court ruled that the plaintiffs — including two state governments and eminent scientists banned from social media — did not have “standing” because they had not proven to negligent justices (how many pages in the files did they actually read?) that federal intervention and string-pulling injured them.

Bizarrely, the court denied standing even after conceding that it “may be true” that social-media platforms “continue to suppress [plaintiffs] speech according to policies initially adopted under Government pressure.”

... Maybe the outcome was a foregone conclusion when Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson blathered that “my biggest concern” is “the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods"...

But the whole point of the Bill of Rights is to hamstring would-be federal tyrants.

It is a sad day when Supreme Court justices behave like shiftless members of Congress who vote for a thousand-page bill that they never bothered to read. In lieu of constitutional rights and “government under the law,” the Supreme Court tells Americans they only deserve “plausible deniability” for government crimes.

The Ruling Class loves to lie. They NEED to lie. For the children, of course.

you can't handle the truth (so we'll make some up for you)

that’s what going darkside is.

it's easy for monolithic media to go darkside, especially when they are just a few outlets all dependent on state licensure and license.

social media is the defense against this dark art.

this is why so many powerful people want to see social media freedom brought to heel, accountability centralized, and free speech ended.

free speech and open platforms make made up history more difficult to foist upon an unsuspecting populace.

and this means the elites keen to lie to you for you own good lose control of the narrative. it means they lose control of you.

and they do not like that, not one little bit.

It's not about truth. It's about propaganda - "truth gets in the way of finding consensus and getting important things done."

It's about forcefully imposing their own elitist, destructive evil plans on the rest of us.

Leave a Reply